Skip to main content
· 9/29/1992

District of Columbia v. McNeill

Citations

  • 613 A.2d 940
  • 1992 D.C. App. LEXIS 252
  • 1992 WL 246533

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that physicians owe patients a duty of care although damages are not available for all injuries resulting from a breach of this duty
  • noting that physicians owe patients a duty of care although damages are not available for all injuries resulting from a breach of this duty
  • finding that evidence the plaintiff was “in shock,” unable to sleep, and “suffer[ed] from recurring nightmares” satisfied the burden to show serious and verifiable distress
  • requiring that a plaintiff either be in a zone of danger caused by the defendant’s negligence or that the plaintiff be physically endangered for negligent infliction of emotional distress
  • permitting recovery for physical and emotional injuries caused by negligent mismanagement of pregnancy when plaintiff was physically endangered as a result of defendant’s negligence
  • permitting recovery for physical and emotional injuries caused by negligent mismanagement of pregnancy when plaintiff was physically endangered as a result of defendant's negligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, King, Pryor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.