Skip to main content
· 5/7/2009

District of Columbia Housing Authority v. Pinkney

Citations

  • 970 A.2d 854
  • 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 77
  • 2009 WL 1227726

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellant waived its objection to inconsistency in remarkably similar verdict by failing to raise it before jury’s discharge
  • noting that “a landowner has the ‘duty to perform such inspections as a reasonable person would find necessary to detect or learn about any dangerous condition’” (emphasis added
  • stating that “the District government . . . shall not be liable for damages for any action, or failure to take action, by the Authority or its officers, employees, or agents.”
  • Constructive notice requires a showing that the condition existed \for a sufficient length of time\ such that the party should have known about the condition
  • “We review a trial court's determination regarding the applicability of sovereign immunity de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fisher, Thompson, Nebeker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.