District No. 1-Pacific Coast District v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a judge was “not required to consider a new argument and new facts that [the movant] could not justify failing to present to the court earlier”
• orders denying Rule 59 (e) and Rule 60 (b) \motions for reconsideration\ are reviewed under abuse of discretion standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).