Skip to main content
· 12/7/2009

Distribution Postal Consultants, Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 90 Fed. Cl. 569
  • 2009 WL 4672560

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, while a court ruling on a motion for summary judgment “may consider evidence other than that listed in Civ.R. 56 when there is no objection, it need not do so”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bruggink

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.