Distribuidora Del Pacifico, S. A. v. Gonzalez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that documents prepared in the ordinary course of business are not subject to the work product privilege
• describing Rule 26(b)(3) as applying “only to tangibles and codif[ying] that portion of the Hickman opinion that relates to documents. Hickman v. Taylor and other common law developments also govern intangibles, such as interviews.”
• a document “analyzing the likely outcome of ... litigation ... does not lose protection merely because it is also created in order to assist with a business decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).