Skip to main content
· 10/24/2014

Dispennett v. Cook

Citations

  • 585 F. App'x 575

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Vertical privity is not required for a claim of breach of the implied warranty of merchantability even if that claim sounds in contract. . . . Still, vertical privity is required for . . . breach of implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fernandez, Fisher, Kozinski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.