Dishman v. Joseph

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding case to the PAB because it could not determine, as a matter of law, how the PAB would have ruled had it correctly applied the law to the facts
• recognizing the distinction between the two concepts
• “the fee hearing is not to be treated as a hearing on a motion for reconsideration”
• in the fees action, the state was bound by the facts as determined in the merits action; a request for attorney’s fees is “not an invitation to engage in a second major litigation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).