Discover Bank v. Bolinske, Sr.
Citations
- 950 N.W.2d 417
- 2020 ND 228
Syllabus
This Court will not consider documents in a party's appendix that did not appear in the district court's record under N.D.R.App.P. 30(a)(1). A party is not entitled to oral argument on a motion to vacate unless they follow the requirements of N.D.R.Ct. 3.2(a)(3) and secure a time for the argument within 14 days of the request. Issues not adequately briefed will not be addressed on appeal. A party's appearance, without a pleading showing a meritorious defense, does not protect a party from default judgment. The district court was not required under N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(a)(3) to set forth findings of fact in its order denying the motion to vacate.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the finding that defendant’s “sexual conduct with the victim was not consensual is not supported by competent, substantial evidence”
- “[T]he court must set forth the basis of its determination.” (citing Clark v. State, 95 So.3d 986, 989 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.