Discount Tobacco City & Lottery, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adding that “whether a disclosure is scrutinized under Zauderer turns on whether the disclosure conveys factual information or an opinion, not on whether the disclosure emotionally affects its audience or incites controversy”
• stating that Zauderer applies in the context of \misleading or potentially misleading commercial speech\
• deciding between applying strict scrutiny or Zauderer to compelled commercial speech
• upholding federally required health warnings on cigarette packaging and in cigarette advertisements, relying on the Second Circuit’s opinion in Sorrell
• upholding federally required health warnings on cigarette packaging and in cigarette advertisements, relying on the Second Circuit’s opinion in Sorrell
• deciding between applying strict scrutiny or Zauderer to compelled commercial speech

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).