Disciplinary Proceedings v. Evans

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, in finding that evidence was admissible under OCGA § 24-4-403, the trial court gave a limiting instruction to the jury and qualified jurors under oath are presumed to follow the trial court’s instructions
• the trial court's admission of evidence will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion
• the trial court’s admission of evidence will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion
• defendant argued that evidence of his prior DUI conviction admitted under Rule 417 was more prejudicial than probative under Rule 403, and this Court presumed without deciding that Rule 403 applied to evidence admissible under Rule 417

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).