Disciplinary Proceeding Against Kronenberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[a]ttempting to tamper with a witness represents a flagrant disregard for the very principles upon which our legal system is grounded and renders an attorney unfit to practice law
• stating that “[a]ttempting to tamper with a witness represents a flagrant disregard for the very principles upon which our legal system is grounded and renders an attorney unfit to practice law”
• observing that such tests “are not recognized as reliable evidence”
• to challenge findings of fact, respondent attorney must argue why specific findings are unsupported and cite to the record to support the argument
• to challenge findings of fact, respondent attorney must argue why specific findings are unsupported and cite to the record to support the argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).