Skip to main content
· 5/27/2020

Disciplinary Counsel v. Wilson (Slip Opinion)

Citations

  • 160 Ohio St. 3d 528
  • 159 N.E.3d 1141
  • 2020 Ohio 3050

Syllabus

Attorneys—Misconduct—Violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, including failing to promptly deliver funds or other property that a client or a third party is entitled to receive—Indefinite suspension.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • commenting that notice is not required under Powell for an aggravated sentence based on RCW 9.94A-,535(2)(c) for post -Blakely resentencing
  • stating that the SRA contains the procedure for a sentencing court to consider certain exceptional sentencing factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.