Skip to main content
· 5/22/2002

Disciplinary Counsel v. Watson

Citations

  • 2002 Ohio 2222
  • 95 Ohio St. 3d 364

Syllabus

Attorneys at law—Misconduct—One-year suspension—Charging a clearly excessive fee—Engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation—Engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice—Threatening to file criminal charges solely to obtain advantage in a civil matter—Prejudicing or damaging client during course of professional relationship—Withdrawing from employment before taking reasonable steps to avoid prejudice to client—Surreptitiously recording conversations with client's son and his attorney.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.