Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 12/19/2017

Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith.

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 9087
  • 96 N.E.3d 234
  • 152 Ohio St. 3d 337

Syllabus

Attorneys-Misconduct-Conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation-Conduct adversely reflecting on fitness to practice law-Charging an excessive fee-Attorney who engaged in unethical and fraudulent billing practices suspended from the practice of law for two years and ordered to pay restitution.

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.