Skip to main content
· 8/1/2018

Disciplinary Counsel v. Skolnick.

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 2990
  • 104 N.E.3d 775
  • 153 Ohio St. 3d 283

Syllabus

Attorneys—Misconduct—Violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct—One-year license suspension with six months of the suspension stayed on condition.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Plaintiff] must have had an interest in the horses at the time they were given to [the Defendant] in order to sustain a § 548 cause of action.”
  • “In any event, the search and seizure here—a single incident—does not amount to a continuing tort, one which would forever suspend the statute of limitations absent the horses’ return.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.