Ohio Supreme Court· 12/20/2018
Disciplinary Counsel v. Pigott.
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 5096
- 122 N.E.3d 1270
- 155 Ohio St. 3d 613
Syllabus
Attorneys—Misconduct—Violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, including failing to obtain clients' written consent to contingent-fee agreements, failing to promptly deliver funds to clients, and engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation—Six-month suspension.
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dayton Bar Ass'n v. GerrenOhio Supreme Court· 2004-08-18· cited 20×
- Columbus Bar Association v. WatsonOhio Supreme Court· 2015-11-10· cited 8×
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BubnaOhio Supreme Court· 2007-12-12· cited 4×
- Disciplinary Counsel v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 2012-03-28· cited 3×
- Disciplinary Counsel v. ManningOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-08· cited 3×
Other cases named Disciplinary Counsel v. Pigott.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.