Ohio Supreme Court· 12/20/2018
Disciplinary Counsel v. Oviatt.
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 5091
- 122 N.E.3d 1246
- 155 Ohio St. 3d 586
Syllabus
Attorneys—Misconduct—Violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct and the Rules for the Government of the Bar—Conditionally stayed six-month suspension.
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GardnerOhio Supreme Court· 2003-08-13· cited 47×
- Disciplinary Counsel v. GaulOhio Supreme Court· 2010-10-07· cited 14×
- Disciplinary Counsel v. ShimkoOhio Supreme Court· 2012-12-06· cited 13×
- Cincinnati Bar Association v. HauckOhio Supreme Court· 2016-11-22· cited 8×
- Columbus Bar Ass'n v. HartwellOhio Supreme Court· 1988-03-16· cited 8×
- Disciplinary Counsel v. MillerOhio Supreme Court· 2017-05-17· cited 5×
- Selwyn v. GrimesOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-20· cited 3×
- Akron Bar Association v. Tucker.Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-07-10· cited 1×
Other cases named Disciplinary Counsel v. Oviatt.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.