Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 4/28/2022

Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Diam

Citations

  • 168 Ohio St. 3d 137
  • 196 N.E.3d 812
  • 2022 Ohio 1370

Syllabus

Attorneys—Misconduct—Violation of Jud.Cond.R. 2.8(B) by failing to be patient, dignified, or courteous to litigants or witnesses while acting in an official capacity and failing to require similar conduct of a lawyer subject to the judge's direction and control—Conditionally stayed six-month suspension.

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Diam

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.