Skip to main content
· 4/19/1995

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mesi

Citations

  • 1995 Ohio 69
  • 72 Ohio St. 3d 45

Syllabus

Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Indefinite suspension—Conviction for misprision—Engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice—Engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on fitness to practice law—Continuing multiple employment that adversely affects professional judgment on behalf of client without client's consent after full disclosure—Neglecting an entrusted legal matter—Failing to preserve the identity of funds of a client—Restitution a condition for reinstatement.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.