Skip to main content
· 9/23/1998

Disciplinary Counsel v. Meros

Citations

  • 1998 Ohio 522
  • 83 Ohio St. 3d 222

Syllabus

Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Eighteen-month suspension—Engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice—Engaging in conduct adversely reflecting on fitness to practice law—Failing to preserve confidences of a client—Asserting a position or taking actions merely to harass or maliciously injure another—Practicing law in a jurisdiction where to do so would be in violation of regulations in that jurisdiction.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.