Ohio Supreme Court· 8/29/2012
Disciplinary Counsel v. Meehan
Citations
- 2012 Ohio 3894
- 133 Ohio St. 3d 51
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “disbarment is generally necessary ‘where previous sanctions have been ignored with relative impunity’ ”
- “disbarment is generally necessary ‘where previous sanctions have been ignored with relative impunity’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Connor, Pfeifer, Stratton, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court· 2002-09-25· cited 385×
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court· 2007-10-10· cited 295×
- Akron Bar Ass'n v. ThorpeOhio Supreme Court· 1988-12-30· cited 9×
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court· 1995-03-29· cited 8×
- Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. ShabazzOhio Supreme Court· 1995-11-08· cited 6×
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BlackwellOhio Supreme Court· 1997-09-24· cited 6×
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. CarsonOhio Supreme Court· 2001-08-15· cited 6×
- Toledo Bar Assn. v. ScottOhio Supreme Court· 2011-08-25· cited 4×
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BlackwellOhio Supreme Court· 1997-09-24· cited 3×
- Disciplinary Counsel v. CarsonOhio Supreme Court· 2001-08-15· cited 3×
- Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. ShabazzOhio Supreme Court· 1995-11-08· cited 2×
Other cases named Disciplinary Counsel v. Meehan
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.