Ohio Supreme Court· 2/28/2019

Disciplinary Counsel v. Marshall.

Citations

2019 Ohio 670
125 N.E.3d 856
156 Ohio St. 3d 263

Syllabus

Attorneys—Misconduct—Violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct and the Judicial Conduct Rules—A judge is required to respect and comply with the law and act in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary—Six-month suspension.

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Goulding (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-09-29· cited 5×
Disciplinary Counsel v. Kegley
Ohio Supreme Court· 2025-03-20· cited 4×
Disciplinary Counsel v. Rudduck
Ohio Supreme Court· 2026-04-02· cited 1×
Disciplinary Counsel v. Skelton
Ohio Supreme Court· 2026-06-02

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hoague
Ohio Supreme Court· 2000-03-29· cited 17×
Disciplinary Counsel v. Hale
Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-11-18· cited 12×
Disciplinary Counsel v. Marshall
Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-04-01· cited 6×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.