Skip to main content
· 8/2/2018

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mancino.

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 3017
  • 110 N.E.3d 1265
  • 154 Ohio St. 3d 49

Syllabus

Attorneys—Misconduct—When a professional-conduct rule found by the Board of Professional Conduct to be violated requires that an attorney-client relationship exist and no such relationship existed, the finding of a violation cannot be accepted—When a panel of the Board of Professional Conduct unanimously dismisses a count of a disciplinary complaint for insufficient evidence under Gov.Bar R. V(12)(G), the dismissal is not reviewable by the board or by the Supreme Court of Ohio—Complaint dismissed.

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.