Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 12/27/2018

Disciplinary Counsel v. Karp

Citations

  • 124 N.E.3d 819
  • 2018 Ohio 5212
  • 156 Ohio St. 3d 218

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing the attorney’s dishonesty toward his client in justifying the imposition of a six-month suspension for repeatedly and falsely assuring the client that he had refiled the client’s claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.