Skip to main content
· 8/23/1995

Disciplinary Counsel v. James

Citations

  • 1995 Ohio 318
  • 73 Ohio St. 3d 289

Syllabus

Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Indefinite suspension—Conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation—Intentionally causing client prejudice or damage—Conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice—Neglect of an entrusted legal matter—Failing to notify client of having received client's funds—Failing to promptly pay or deliver funds client is entitled to receive.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.