· 3/17/2022
Disciplinary Counsel v. Hoover (Slip Opinion)
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 769
Syllabus
Attorneys—Misconduct—Violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, including engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on a lawyer's fitness to practice law—Two-year suspension with credit for the time served under interim felony suspension.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that Bishop-Fuller protocol applies to any statutorily privileged records
- rejecting defendant’s claim that expert testimony was needed to support prosecutor’s closing argument that there are reasons why women often remain in relationships with abusive men
- remarks contesting credibility of defendant’s testimony “had a basis in the evidence and were not the prosecutor’s personal comments on the credibility of the defendant”
- claim of ineffective assistance for failure to obtain disclosure of counseling records turns on evaluation of records by trial court judge and determination of relevance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.