Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 9/27/2018

Disciplinary Counsel v. Harter.

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 3899
  • 116 N.E.3d 1255
  • 154 Ohio St. 3d 561

Syllabus

Attorneys—Misconduct—Violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, including misappropriating client funds, knowingly making false statements of material fact in connection with a disciplinary matter, and engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation—Permanent disbarment.

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Disciplinary Counsel v. Harter.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.