Skip to main content
· 9/30/1998

Disciplinary Counsel v. Ewing

Citations

  • 1998 Ohio 286
  • 83 Ohio St. 3d 314

Syllabus

Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Disbarment—Engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation—Engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice—Engaging in conduct adversely reflecting on fitness to practice law—Disregarding the ruling of a tribunal.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.