Skip to main content
· 4/24/2002

Disciplinary Counsel v. Easterwood

Citations

  • 2002 Ohio 1942
  • 95 Ohio St. 3d 113

Syllabus

Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Indefinite suspension—Engaging in conduct adversely reflecting on fitness to practice law—Engaging in conduct involving moral turpitude—Engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice—Neglect of an entrusted legal matter—Failing to carry out contract of professional employment—Engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation—Neglecting or refusing to assist in disciplinary investigation—Commingling client funds with personal funds.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.