Ohio Supreme Court· 10/2/2018
Disciplinary Counsel v. Bennett.
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 3973
- 114 N.E.3d 167
- 154 Ohio St. 3d 314
Syllabus
Attorneys—Misconduct—Violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, including failing to provide competent representation to a client, failing to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter, and engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation—One-year suspension.
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Disciplinary Counsel v. RohrerOhio Supreme Court· 2009-11-17· cited 26×
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Schuman.Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-12-06· cited 26×
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BennettOhio Supreme Court· 2010-02-04· cited 19×
- Disciplinary Counsel v. DannOhio Supreme Court· 2012-11-20· cited 13×
- Toledo Bar Association v. DeMarcoOhio Supreme Court· 2015-11-05· cited 13×
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court· 2003-03-19· cited 12×
- Toledo Bar Assn. v. MillerOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-02· cited 11×
- Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. Vardiman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-02-03· cited 11×
- In re BennettOhio Supreme Court· 2008-02-15· cited 2×
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BennettOhio Supreme Court· 2011-04-29· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.