Skip to main content
· 9/18/2023

Disciplinary Board v. Slyva

Citations

  • 2023 ND 169

Syllabus

Lawyer reprimanded.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that singling out some but not all undocumented immigrants for discrimination constituted a “classification based on alienage”
  • holding that singling out some but not all undocumented immigrants for discrimination constituted a “classification based on alienage”
  • stating that “[c]ontrol over immigration and naturalization is entrusted exclusively to the Federal Government, and a State has no power to interfere”
  • stating that “[c]ontrol over immigration and naturalization is entrusted exclusively to the Federal Government, and a State has no power to interfere”
  • jettisoning immutability requirement and scrutinizing classification of resident aliens closely despite aliens' voluntary status as residents
  • rejecting immutability requirement in treating group of resident aliens as suspect class despite their ability to opt out of class voluntarily

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.