Skip to main content
· 6/6/2016

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. Enget

Citations

  • 2016 ND 110
  • 881 N.W.2d 16
  • 2016 N.D. LEXIS 110
  • 2016 WL 3141660

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a statute is not to be read in isolation but must be read in context of the entire statute
  • “When determining the legislative intent of a statute, no portion of the statute is read in isolation, but rather the portions are read in context to harmonize all of the statute’s provisions.” (internal quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vande Walle, Sandstrom, Kapsner, Crothers, McEvers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.