Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State v. Bruggeman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the agency satisfied HRS § 91-12’s requirements through the inclusion of a substantially similar paragraph in the introduction to the agency decision
• holding the agency complied with Ka Paʻakai because it identified no Native Hawaiian cultural resources or traditional or customary practices within the project area and found that no traditional and customary rights would be affected or impaired by the proposed action
• \the circumstances did not fairly give rise to an appearance of impropriety and reasonably cast suspicion on [the adjudicator's] impartiality\
• \the circumstances did not fairly give rise to an appearance of impropriety and reasonably cast suspicion on [the adjudicator's] impartiality\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).