Skip to main content
· 8/6/1979

Disciplinary Board of Supreme Court v. Lee

Citations

  • 283 N.W.2d 179
  • 1979 N.D. LEXIS 299

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • failure to object to the admission of K.S.A. 60-455 [b] evidence does not waive the right to raise on appeal the issue of whether the failure to give a limiting instruction was clearly erroneous
  • failure to object to the admission of K.S.A. 60-455[b] evidence does not waive the right to raise on appeal the issue of whether the failure to give a limiting instruction was clearly erroneous
  • failure to object to instruction raises persuasive bar complaining party must hurdle on appeal
  • directing district court to enter nunc pro tunc order
  • K.S.A. 2010 Supp. 60-455[a] apphes to situations involving “ ‘evidence that a person committed a crime or civil wrong on a specified occasion’ ” to infer a person has the disposition or a propensity to “ ‘commit! ] another crime or civil wrong on another specified occasion.’ ”
  • (declining, to consider issue for this reason

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Erickstad, Paul, Pederson, Sand, Son, Walle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.