Skip to main content
· 5/15/1998

DiSalvo v. DiSalvo (In Re DiSalvo)

Citations

  • 221 B.R. 769
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 5803
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4164
  • 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 629
  • 1998 WL 321095

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it was erroneous to impose the double sanction of losing both the security and the underlying obligation for a violation of 726(a)
  • holding that it was erroneous to impose the double sanction of losing both the security and the underlying obligation for a violation of § 726(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Perris, Jones, Tchaikovsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.