Disability Advocates, Inc. v. New York Coalition for Quality Assisted Living, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the record did not plausibly allege that an organization could be deemed a membership organization for standing purposes
• noting that “standing is the threshold question in every federal case” Inc., No. 18-cv-07550 (LAP), 2019 WL 2611168, at (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 28, 2019
• noting that this rule is “an axiomatic principle of federal jurisdiction,” and collecting cases
• characterizing Hunt as holding that \representation and control\ are indicia of membership that gives rise to associational standing
• “Tellingly, there is scant evidence in the record that the individuals with mental illness whom DAI purports to represent have the power to elect its directors, make budget decisions, or influence DAI’s activities or litigation strategies.”
• “[S]tanding is ‘the threshold question in every federal case.’” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).