DirecTV, Inc. v. Tasche

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting in the first instance a broad interpretation of § 2520 recognizing a private right of action for all Wiretap Act violations
• adopting in the first instance a broad interpretation of § 2520 recognizing a private right of action for all Wiretap Act violations
• “By itself, a criminal statute generally does not give rise to a private right of action.” (citing Cort v. Ash, 422 U.S. 66, 79 (1975); Ragsdale v. Turnock, 941 F.2d 501, 509 (7th Cir. 1991))
• “By itself, a criminal statute generally does not give rise to a private right of action.” (citing Cort v. Ash, 422 U.S. 66, 79 (1975); Ragsdale v. Turnock, 941 F.2d 501, 509 (7th Cir. 1991))
• “By itself, a criminal statute generally does not give rise to a private right of action.” (citing Cort v. Ash, 422 U.S. 66, 79 (1975); Ragsdale v. Turnock, 941 F.2d 501, 509 (7th Cir. 1991))
• order on motion to dismiss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).