Directv, Inc. v. Jeff Budden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that personal knowledge of an investigation into “pirate access devices” can be “reasonably inferred” from the affiant’s position as Senior Director of Signal Integrity
• “[Attempting] to create a fact issue . . . by relying on a conclusory and self-serving affidavit is on unsteady ground.”
• “attempt[ing] to create a fact issue . . . by relying on a conclusory and self-serving [statement] is on unsteady ground”
• stating personal knowledge of investigation into “pirate access devices” can be “reasonably inferred” from affiant’s position as Senior Director of Signal Integrity
• “[Attempting] to create a fact issue ... by relying on a conclusory and self-serving affidavit is on unsteady ground.”
• inferring personal knowledge of a corporate investigation based on an affiant’s position within the company

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).