Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Greenwich Collieries

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the ALJ must weigh all relevant evidence together, rather than analyzing the evidence separately depending on its type
• concluding that the Court’s “cursory conclusion” in a different case “does not warrant the same level of deference we typically give our precedents”
• holding that the ALJ must weigh all relevant evidence together, rather than analyzing the evidence separately depending on its type
• holding that, under the Administrative Procedure Act, the burden of proof encompasses the burden of persuasion; when the evidence is evenly balanced, the party with the burden must lose
• holding that, under the Administrative Procedure Act, the burden of proof encompasses the burden of persuasion; when the evidence is evenly balanced, the party with the burden must lose
• stating that “the assignment of the burden of proof is a rule of substantive law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).