Director of Revenue v. CNA Holdings, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a court need not interpret an unambiguous statute because its plain meaning controls
• “[e]ven though the language of the statute is plain and unambiguous, we must decide whether a literal reading of § 1903 leads to unreasonable results.”
• “The goal of statutory construction is to ‘ascertain and give effect to the intent of the legislature.’” (quoting Ingram v. Thorpe, 747 A.2d 545, 547 (Del. 2000))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).