Direct TV, Inc. v. Treworgy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 2520(a) does not create a private right of action for possession of a device in violation of § 2512(1)(b), because the plain language limits the class of defendants to individuals or entities that committed the violation suffered by the plaintiff
• “Because the language of section 2520(a) does not create a private right of action against a person who possesses a device in violation of section 2512(1)(b), we cannot create one.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).