Skip to main content
· 8/9/2005

Direct Communications, Inc. v. Horizon Retail Construction, Inc.

Citations

  • 387 F. Supp. 2d 828
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16696
  • 2005 WL 1950440

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A motion for a more definite statement under Rule 12(e) is intended only to clear up confusion and not to replace traditional discovery.”
  • Rule 12(e) motion is intended to eliminate confusion, not replace discovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Castillo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.