Skip to main content
· 3/30/1998

Dipol v. New York City Transit Authority

Citations

  • 999 F. Supp. 309
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6687
  • 1998 WL 155557

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the fact that the employer, after receiving information from a doctor, immediately placed the plaintiff on no-work status made out a “regarded as” claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.