· 7/8/2011
Dipippo v. Sperling
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the court did not have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1495 because plaintiff’s unjust conviction and imprisonment claims rose from state crimes
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: STERN, J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.