DiPietro v. Cessna Aircraft Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[e]vidence of subsequent remedial conduct to disprove a plaintiffs comparative fault is inadmissible”
• \Evidence that tends to exculpate plaintiff in a comparative fault case places fault upon the defendant.\
• “The process of determining comparative fault, when only two parties are involved, is a ‘zero sum game.’ When negligence is moved out of the plaintiffs column, it must move into the defendant’s column.”
• “The process of determining comparative fault, when only two parties are involved, is a ‘zero sum game.’ When negligence is moved out of the plaintiff’s column, it must move into the defendant’s column.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).