Dinwiddie v. Jacobs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, since the consequences of legal malpractice frequently involve “hypothetical questions,” in the event that “damages cannot be measured precisely, they can be estimated”
• upholding dismissal of legal malpractice claim for counsel’s failure to procure court approval of a motion for a special marital master because plaintiff failed to “postulate any harm” that resulted
• causation is not for jury where reasonable minds can not differ on the outcome

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).