New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1/10/1995
Dinter v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Citations
- 651 A.2d 1033
- 278 N.J. Super. 521
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to permit recovery in quantum meruit to an attorney who withdrew after an unsuccessful trial because “such an approach might also cause a prospective new attorney to pause before undertaking representation to prosecute an appeal or subsequent trial after remand.”
- refusing to permit recovery in quantum meruit to an attorney who withdrew after an unsuccessful trial because “such an approach might also cause a prospective new attorney to pause before undertaking representation to prosecute an appeal or subsequent trial after remand.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Petrella, Havey and Brochin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Glick v. Barclays De Zoete Wedd, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-04-28· cited 19×
- In re Distribution of Attorney's Fees Between Stowman Law Firm, P.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-10-28· cited 16×
- Bruno v. Gale, Wentworth & Dillon RealtyNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2004-06-29· cited 12×
- Estate of Pinter v. McGeeNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-08-01· cited 9×
- Matter of Estate of TravarelliNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1995-08-07· cited 6×
- Vaccaro v. Estate of GorovoyNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-07-02· cited 4×
- Dinter v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANYSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1995-04-27· cited 1×
- Travarelli v. Maressa, Goldstein, Birsner, Patterson, Drinkwater & OddoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1995-08-07· cited 1×
- In re Petition for Distribution of Attorney's Fees between Stowman Law Firm, P.A., and Lori Peterson Law Firm, formerly d/b/a Lori Peterson and Associates.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-10-28
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Shaw v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals· 1986-10-14· cited 242×
- Plaza Shoe Store, Inc. v. Hermel, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri· 1982-07-06· cited 47×
- Faro v. RomaniSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-07-07· cited 40×
- International Materials Corp. v. Sun Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri· 1992-01-28· cited 39×
- La Mantia v. DurstNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1989-06-28· cited 38×
- Dinter v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-11-14· cited 35×
- Cohen v. Radio-Electronics OfficersNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1994-07-28· cited 33×
- Buckelew v. GrossbardNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1983-04-18· cited 28×
- Robinowitz v. PozziCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-04-20· cited 16×
- In Re Estate of PoliNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1975-05-01· cited 14×
- Hughes v. EisnerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1951-05-22· cited 13×
- Hughes v. EisnerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1950-04-20· cited 10×
- Vitale v. La CourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-03-14· cited 10×
- Jersey Land and Development Corp. v. United StatesD. New Jersey· 1972-04-05· cited 9×
- Holzberg v. FeuersteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1984-10-22· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.