Dinsmore v. Piper Jaffray, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that the expert witness did not invade the province of the jury because, in part, “the prosecutor argued only the facts of th[e] particular case during her closing arguments.”
• “While a fiduciary relationship does exist between [stock]brokers and their [customers], fiduciary duties are not owed when the parties are dealing at arm’s length . . . [and] . . . arise only when one undertakes to act primarily for another’s benefit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).