Skip to main content
· 10/24/2008

Dinovo v. United States

Citations

  • 585 F. Supp. 2d 168
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93918
  • 2008 WL 4900844

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Amendment of a § 2255 petition is not allowed, however, ‘after judgment has been rendered and while the judgment still remains in force.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gorton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.