Indiana Supreme Court· 5/11/1971
Dinning v. State
Citations
- 269 N.E.2d 371
- 256 Ind. 399
- 1971 Ind. LEXIS 644
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding denial of pretrial motion for the release of grand jury testimony in anticipation of the cross-examination of witnesses
- reaffirming the statutory interpretation of Antrobus
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Givan, Arterburn, Hunter, Prentice, Debruler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Loyd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1980-01-11· cited 405×
- Blackburn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1973-01-24· cited 243×
- State v. LoukWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1983-03-25· cited 122×
- DeVaney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1972-11-10· cited 86×
- Robinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1977-08-04· cited 66×
- City of East Chicago v. East Chicago Second Century, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court· 2009-06-30· cited 38×
- Kerns v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1976-06-30· cited 26×
- Hinojosa v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2003-01-15· cited 10×
- Sargent v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1972-10-10· cited 10×
- Hinojosa v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-07-17· cited 3×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- ANTROBUS v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1970-02-03· cited 95×
- Bernard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1967-10-31· cited 74×
- Johns v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1968-09-18· cited 70×
- Brewer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1969-11-14· cited 47×
- Langley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1968-01-09· cited 43×
- Mahoney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1964-09-24· cited 8×
- Holsey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1970-02-03· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.